𝘓’𝘌𝑛𝘵𝑒 𝑃𝘳𝑜 𝐿𝘰𝑐𝘰 𝘐𝑡𝘢𝑙𝘪𝑎𝘯𝑒 𝐴𝘗𝑆 – 𝘌𝑃𝘓𝐼, 𝑝𝘳𝑒𝘴𝑖𝘦𝑑𝘶𝑡𝘰 𝘥𝑎 Ciurleo Pasquale, 𝑟𝘦𝑛𝘥𝑒 𝑛𝘰𝑡𝘰 𝘤ℎ𝘦 𝘭𝑎 𝐹𝘰𝑛𝘥𝑎𝘻𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘊𝐸𝘕𝑆𝘐𝑆 ℎ𝘢 𝘴𝑜𝘭𝑜 𝑟𝘦𝑐𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑒𝘮𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘦 𝘱𝑢𝘣𝑏𝘭𝑖𝘤𝑎𝘵𝑜 𝑢𝘯𝑎 𝑣𝘦𝑟𝘴𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘢𝑔𝘨𝑖𝘰𝑟𝘯𝑎𝘵𝑎 𝑑𝘦𝑙 𝑅𝘢𝑝𝘱𝑜𝘳𝑡𝘰 “𝐿𝘢 𝘱𝑟𝘰𝑚𝘰𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑒 𝑡𝘦𝑟𝘳𝑖𝘵𝑜𝘳𝑖𝘢𝑙𝘦 𝘦 𝘤𝑢𝘭𝑡𝘶𝑟𝘢𝑙𝘦 𝘥𝑒𝘭𝑙𝘦 𝘊𝑜𝘮𝑢𝘯𝑖𝘵𝑎̀ 𝑖𝘯 𝘐𝑡𝘢𝑙𝘪𝑎. 𝘐𝑑𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑖𝘵𝑎̀ 𝑒 𝑟𝘶𝑜𝘭𝑜 𝑑𝘦𝑙𝘭𝑒 𝑃𝘳𝑜 𝐿𝘰𝑐𝘰”, 𝘨𝑖𝘢̀ 𝘥𝑖𝘧𝑓𝘶𝑠𝘰 𝘯𝑒𝘭 𝘯𝑜𝘷𝑒𝘮𝑏𝘳𝑒 2024.

𝘓’𝘢𝑔𝘨𝑖𝘰𝑟𝘯𝑎𝘮𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘰 𝘦̀ 𝘪𝑛𝘵𝑒𝘳𝑣𝘦𝑛𝘶𝑡𝘰 𝘢 𝘴𝑒𝘨𝑢𝘪𝑡𝘰 𝘥𝑖 𝑢𝘯𝑎 𝑓𝘰𝑟𝘮𝑎𝘭𝑒 𝑟𝘪𝑐𝘩𝑖𝘦𝑠𝘵𝑎 𝑑𝘦𝑙𝘭’𝘌𝑃𝘓𝐼, 𝘱𝑟𝘦𝑠𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑎𝘵𝑎 𝑝𝘦𝑟 𝑖𝘭 𝘵𝑟𝘢𝑚𝘪𝑡𝘦 𝘥𝑒𝘭 𝘱𝑟𝘰𝑝𝘳𝑖𝘰 𝘭𝑒𝘨𝑎𝘭𝑒, 𝘈𝑣𝘷. 𝑃𝘪𝑒𝘳 𝘓𝑢𝘪𝑔𝘪 𝘋’𝘈𝑚𝘰𝑟𝘦, 𝑐𝘰𝑛 𝑙’𝑜𝘣𝑖𝘦𝑡𝘵𝑖𝘷𝑜 𝑑𝘪 𝘧𝑎𝘷𝑜𝘳𝑖𝘳𝑒 𝑢𝘯𝑎 𝑟𝘢𝑝𝘱𝑟𝘦𝑠𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑎𝘻𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘱𝑖𝘶̀ 𝘤ℎ𝘪𝑎𝘳𝑎 𝑑𝘦𝑙 𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘵𝑒𝘴𝑡𝘰 𝘢𝑠𝘴𝑜𝘤𝑖𝘢𝑡𝘪𝑣𝘰 𝘰𝑔𝘨𝑒𝘵𝑡𝘰 𝘥𝑖 𝑎𝘯𝑎𝘭𝑖𝘴𝑖. 𝘕𝑒𝘭𝑙𝘢 𝘯𝑢𝘰𝑣𝘢 𝘦𝑑𝘪𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑒 𝑑𝘦𝑙 𝑅𝘢𝑝𝘱𝑜𝘳𝑡𝘰 𝘷𝑖𝘦𝑛𝘦 𝘪𝑛𝘧𝑎𝘵𝑡𝘪 𝘦𝑠𝘱𝑙𝘪𝑐𝘪𝑡𝘢𝑡𝘰 𝘤ℎ𝘦 𝘪 𝘥𝑎𝘵𝑖 𝑟𝘢𝑐𝘤𝑜𝘭𝑡𝘪 𝘦 𝘤𝑜𝘮𝑚𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑎𝘵𝑖 𝑠𝘪 𝘳𝑖𝘧𝑒𝘳𝑖𝘴𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘰 𝘦𝑠𝘤𝑙𝘶𝑠𝘪𝑣𝘢𝑚𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑒 𝑎𝘭𝑙𝘦 𝘗𝑟𝘰 𝘓𝑜𝘤𝑜 𝑎𝘥𝑒𝘳𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘪 𝘢𝑙𝘭’𝘜𝑁𝘗𝐿𝘐, 𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑒 𝑙’𝑎𝘮𝑏𝘪𝑡𝘰 𝘥𝑒𝘭𝑙’𝑖𝘯𝑑𝘢𝑔𝘪𝑛𝘦 𝘦̀ 𝘤𝑖𝘳𝑐𝘰𝑠𝘤𝑟𝘪𝑡𝘵𝑜 𝑎𝘭𝑙𝘢 𝘳𝑒𝘵𝑒 𝑎𝘴𝑠𝘰𝑐𝘪𝑎𝘵𝑖𝘷𝑎 𝑝𝘳𝑜𝘮𝑜𝘴𝑠𝘢 𝘥𝑎 𝑡𝘢𝑙𝘦 𝘰𝑟𝘨𝑎𝘯𝑖𝘻𝑧𝘢𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑒.

𝐼𝘭 𝘥𝑜𝘤𝑢𝘮𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘰 𝘢𝑔𝘨𝑖𝘰𝑟𝘯𝑎𝘵𝑜 𝑖𝘯𝑐𝘭𝑢𝘥𝑒 𝑖𝘯𝑜𝘭𝑡𝘳𝑒 𝑢𝘯𝑎 𝑛𝘰𝑡𝘢 𝘮𝑒𝘵𝑜𝘥𝑜𝘭𝑜𝘨𝑖𝘤𝑎 𝑐𝘩𝑒 𝑠𝘱𝑒𝘤𝑖𝘧𝑖𝘤𝑎 𝑙𝘦 𝘧𝑜𝘯𝑡𝘪 𝘶𝑡𝘪𝑙𝘪𝑧𝘻𝑎𝘵𝑒 𝑒 𝑙𝘦 𝘮𝑜𝘥𝑎𝘭𝑖𝘵𝑎̀ 𝑑𝘪 𝘦𝑙𝘢𝑏𝘰𝑟𝘢𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑒, 𝘳𝑎𝘧𝑓𝘰𝑟𝘻𝑎𝘯𝑑𝘰 𝘤𝑜𝘴𝑖̀ 𝑙𝘢 𝘵𝑟𝘢𝑠𝘱𝑎𝘳𝑒𝘯𝑧𝘢 𝘥𝑒𝘭𝑙’𝑖𝘮𝑝𝘰𝑠𝘵𝑎𝘻𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘴𝑐𝘪𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘪𝑓𝘪𝑐𝘢 𝘢𝑑𝘰𝑡𝘵𝑎𝘵𝑎. 𝐸𝘗𝐿𝘐 𝘢𝑐𝘤𝑜𝘨𝑙𝘪𝑒 𝑐𝘰𝑛 𝑓𝘢𝑣𝘰𝑟𝘦 𝘲𝑢𝘦𝑠𝘵𝑜 𝑖𝘯𝑡𝘦𝑟𝘷𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘰, 𝑐𝘩𝑒 𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘴𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘦 𝘥𝑖 𝑙𝘦𝑔𝘨𝑒𝘳𝑒 𝑖 𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘵𝑒𝘯𝑢𝘵𝑖 𝑑𝘦𝑙 𝑅𝘢𝑝𝘱𝑜𝘳𝑡𝘰 𝘢𝑙𝘭’𝘪𝑛𝘵𝑒𝘳𝑛𝘰 𝘥𝑖 𝑢𝘯 𝘲𝑢𝘢𝑑𝘳𝑜 𝑝𝘪𝑢̀ 𝑑𝘦𝑓𝘪𝑛𝘪𝑡𝘰 𝘦 𝘤𝑜𝘦𝑟𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑒 𝑐𝘰𝑛 𝑙𝘦 𝘧𝑖𝘯𝑎𝘭𝑖𝘵𝑎̀ 𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘰𝑠𝘤𝑖𝘵𝑖𝘷𝑒 𝑑𝘪𝑐𝘩𝑖𝘢𝑟𝘢𝑡𝘦, 𝑚𝘢 𝘪𝑛𝘵𝑒𝘯𝑑𝘦 𝘤𝑜𝘮𝑢𝘯𝑞𝘶𝑒 𝑣𝘦𝑟𝘪𝑓𝘪𝑐𝘢𝑟𝘦 𝘭𝑎 𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘨𝑟𝘶𝑖𝘵𝑎̀ 𝑑𝘦𝑖 𝑑𝘢𝑡𝘪 𝘤𝑜𝘯𝑡𝘦𝑛𝘶𝑡𝘪 𝘯𝑒𝘭 𝘥𝑜𝘤𝑢𝘮𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘰 𝘢𝑔𝘨𝑖𝘰𝑟𝘯𝑎𝘵𝑜, 𝘳𝑖𝘴𝑒𝘳𝑣𝘢𝑛𝘥𝑜𝘴𝑖 𝑜𝘨𝑛𝘪 𝘷𝑎𝘭𝑢𝘵𝑎𝘻𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘪𝑛 𝑚𝘦𝑟𝘪𝑡𝘰 𝘢𝑙𝘭𝑎 𝑣𝘪𝑐𝘦𝑛𝘥𝑎.

𝐼𝘯 𝘵𝑎𝘭 𝘴𝑒𝘯𝑠𝘰, 𝐸𝘗𝐿𝘐 𝘯𝑜𝘯 𝘦𝑠𝘤𝑙𝘶𝑑𝘦 𝘥𝑖 𝑎𝘥𝑖𝘳𝑒 𝑙𝘦 𝘴𝑒𝘥𝑖 𝑐𝘰𝑚𝘱𝑒𝘵𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘪 𝘱𝑒𝘳 𝘭𝑎 𝑡𝘶𝑡𝘦𝑙𝘢 𝘥𝑒𝘭𝑙𝘦 𝘱𝑟𝘰𝑝𝘳𝑖𝘦 𝘳𝑎𝘨𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘪, 𝑖𝘯 𝘱𝑎𝘳𝑡𝘪𝑐𝘰𝑙𝘢𝑟𝘦 𝘤𝑜𝘯 𝘳𝑖𝘧𝑒𝘳𝑖𝘮𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘰 𝘢𝑙𝘭𝑎 𝑛𝘦𝑐𝘦𝑠𝘴𝑖𝘵𝑎̀ 𝑑𝘪 𝘨𝑎𝘳𝑎𝘯𝑡𝘪𝑟𝘦 𝘤ℎ𝘦 𝘰𝑔𝘯𝑖 𝑟𝘢𝑝𝘱𝑟𝘦𝑠𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑎𝘻𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘥𝑒𝘭 𝘱𝑙𝘶𝑟𝘢𝑙𝘪𝑠𝘮𝑜 𝑎𝘴𝑠𝘰𝑐𝘪𝑎𝘵𝑖𝘷𝑜 𝑎𝘷𝑣𝘦𝑛𝘨𝑎 𝑎𝘵𝑡𝘳𝑎𝘷𝑒𝘳𝑠𝘰 𝘴𝑡𝘳𝑢𝘮𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘪 𝘤𝑜𝘯𝑜𝘴𝑐𝘪𝑡𝘪𝑣𝘪 𝘧𝑜𝘯𝑑𝘢𝑡𝘪 𝘴𝑖𝘯 𝘥𝑎𝘭𝑙’𝑖𝘯𝑖𝘻𝑖𝘰 𝘴𝑢𝘭𝑙𝘢 𝘮𝑎𝘴𝑠𝘪𝑚𝘢 𝘵𝑟𝘢𝑠𝘱𝑎𝘳𝑒𝘯𝑧𝘢, 𝑜𝘣𝑖𝘦𝑡𝘵𝑖𝘷𝑖𝘵𝑎̀ 𝑒 𝑐𝘰𝑚𝘱𝑙𝘦𝑡𝘦𝑧𝘻𝑎, 𝘢𝑛𝘤𝑜𝘳 𝘱𝑖𝘶̀ 𝘲𝑢𝘢𝑛𝘥𝑜, 𝘤𝑜𝘮𝑒 𝑛𝘦𝑙 𝑐𝘢𝑠𝘰 𝘪𝑛 𝑜𝘨𝑔𝘦𝑡𝘵𝑜, 𝘴𝑖 𝑡𝘳𝑎𝘵𝑡𝘢 𝘥𝑖 𝑢𝘯 𝘳𝑎𝘱𝑝𝘰𝑟𝘵𝑜 𝑟𝘦𝑑𝘢𝑡𝘵𝑜 𝑑𝘢 𝘶𝑛𝘢 𝘍𝑜𝘯𝑑𝘢𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑒 𝑑𝘪 𝘳𝑖𝘭𝑖𝘦𝑣𝘰 𝘲𝑢𝘢𝑙𝘦 𝘪𝑙 𝐶𝘌𝑁𝘚𝐼𝘚.

𝘚𝑖 𝑒𝘷𝑖𝘥𝑒𝘯𝑧𝘪𝑎, 𝘱𝑒𝘳𝑎𝘭𝑡𝘳𝑜, 𝘤ℎ𝘦 𝘪𝑙 𝑟𝘢𝑝𝘱𝑜𝘳𝑡𝘰 𝘪𝑛 𝑞𝘶𝑒𝘴𝑡𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑒 𝑒̀ 𝑠𝘵𝑎𝘵𝑜 𝑐𝘰𝑚𝘮𝑖𝘴𝑠𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑎𝘵𝑜 𝑑𝘢𝑙𝘭’𝘜𝑁𝘗𝐿𝘐 𝘦 𝘱𝑟𝘦𝑠𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑎𝘵𝑜 𝑝𝘶𝑏𝘣𝑙𝘪𝑐𝘢𝑚𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑒 𝑖𝘯 𝘴𝑒𝘥𝑖 𝑖𝘴𝑡𝘪𝑡𝘶𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑎𝘭𝑖 𝑛𝘦𝑙𝘭𝑎 𝑠𝘶𝑎 𝑣𝘦𝑟𝘴𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘰𝑟𝘪𝑔𝘪𝑛𝘢𝑟𝘪𝑎, 𝘱𝑟𝘪𝑚𝘢 𝘥𝑒𝘭𝑙’𝑖𝘯𝑡𝘦𝑟𝘷𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘰 𝘤𝑜𝘳𝑟𝘦𝑡𝘵𝑖𝘷𝑜, 𝘤𝑜𝘯 𝘥𝑎𝘵𝑖 𝑒 𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘵𝑒𝘯𝑢𝘵𝑖 𝑝𝘳𝑖𝘷𝑖 𝑑𝘦𝑙𝘭𝑒 𝑎𝘵𝑡𝘶𝑎𝘭𝑖 𝑠𝘱𝑒𝘤𝑖𝘧𝑖𝘤𝑎𝘻𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘪. 𝐿𝘢 𝘳𝑒𝘵𝑡𝘪𝑓𝘪𝑐𝘢, 𝑖𝘯𝑓𝘢𝑡𝘵𝑖, 𝘴𝑒𝘱𝑝𝘶𝑟 𝑎𝘱𝑝𝘳𝑒𝘻𝑧𝘢𝑡𝘢, 𝑛𝘰𝑛 𝑟𝘪𝑠𝘶𝑙𝘵𝑎 𝑒𝘴𝑠𝘦𝑟𝘦 𝘴𝑡𝘢𝑡𝘢 𝘢𝑐𝘤𝑜𝘮𝑝𝘢𝑔𝘯𝑎𝘵𝑎 𝑑𝘢 𝘶𝑛’𝑎𝘥𝑒𝘨𝑢𝘢𝑡𝘢 𝘤𝑜𝘮𝑢𝘯𝑖𝘤𝑎𝘻𝑖𝘰𝑛𝘦 𝘱𝑢𝘣𝑏𝘭𝑖𝘤𝑎, 𝘤𝑜𝘯 𝘪𝑙 𝑟𝘪𝑠𝘤ℎ𝘪𝑜 𝑐𝘩𝑒 𝑖 𝑑𝘦𝑠𝘵𝑖𝘯𝑎𝘵𝑎𝘳𝑖 𝑖𝘴𝑡𝘪𝑡𝘶𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑎𝘭𝑖 𝑑𝘦𝑙 𝑑𝘰𝑐𝘶𝑚𝘦𝑛𝘵𝑜 𝑐𝘰𝑛𝘵𝑖𝘯𝑢𝘪𝑛𝘰 𝘢 𝘧𝑎𝘳 𝘳𝑖𝘧𝑒𝘳𝑖𝘮𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘰 𝘢 𝘶𝑛𝘢 𝘳𝑎𝘱𝑝𝘳𝑒𝘴𝑒𝘯𝑡𝘢𝑧𝘪𝑜𝘯𝑒 𝑜𝘳𝑚𝘢𝑖 𝑠𝘶𝑝𝘦𝑟𝘢𝑡𝘢.